Cases 41 - 50 of 102
WALKER v. LEMON et al
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMON, FRANK VANIHEL, S. TIERNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OGLE v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
BRYAN A. OGLE
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, RICHARD BROWN, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOW v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 2:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SNOW
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUILMETTE v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. GUILMETTE
Defendant:
CENTURION, SAMUEL BYRD and BOBBY RIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK CORR SERVICES LLC, DAVID BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMOS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2021cv00264
Defendant:
NURSE KIMBERLY HOBSON, NURSE L. CUPP, WEXFORD CORR. SERV. and others
Plaintiff:
ROYAL AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01404
Petitioner:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Respondent:
DR. JACKIE WEST-DENNING, KIM HOBSON, DR. NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. PEORISON et al
as 2:2021cv00191
Defendant:
D. FIRESTONE, MYER, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE R. GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2021cv00804
Defendant:
ROJOLIC, ROBERT CARTER, SCHILLING and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00099
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, SAMUEL BYRD, MARY CHAVEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARC COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
