Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SANDOZ INC. v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
SANDOZ INC.
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Sandoz Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 22-5202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandoz Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
SANDOZ INC. v. COCHRAN et al
as 1:2021cv00600
Plaintiff:
SANDOZ INC.
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, NORRIS W. COCHRAN, IV, JANET WOODCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2020cv00808
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ALEX M. AZAR, II, STEPHEN M. HAHN and others
Plaintiff:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Intervenor Defendant:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP v. BURWELL et al
as 1:2016cv01336
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL , ROBERT CALIFF and FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and IPR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Intervenor_defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. , APOTEX CORP. , APOTEX INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2014cv00786
Plaintiff:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. and TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , MARGARET A. HAMBURG and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor_defendant:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , SANDOZ INC. and MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
