Cases 1 - 10 of 10
THOMAS v. BEDWELL
as 2:2025cv00016
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNS v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00355
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, M. CORRIGAN, VALLE and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKLEY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, SAMUEL BYRD, K. GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLAKLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
EARL MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CASEY CAMBEL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SARAH BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BONNER et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
BONNER, RUTH MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAMARRON v. CENTURION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEE ZAMARRON
Defendant:
CENTURION, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
LE'MERE JONES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
