Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Solo Brands v. SAS Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06983
Plaintiff:
Solo Brands
Defendant:
SAS Group Inc and Duraflame Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Solo Brands v. SAS Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Solo Brands
Defendant:
SAS Group, Inc., Duraflame, Inc., SAS Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
SAS Group, Inc. v. Solo Brands, LLC
as 1:2022cv01065
Defendant:
Solo Brands, LLC formerly known as Solo DTC Brands, LLC formerly known as Frontline Advance, LLC doing business as Solo Stove, Solo DTC Brands, LLC and Frontline Advance, LLC
Plaintiff:
SAS Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Armstrong v. SAS Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05468
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, SAS Group, Inc. and XYZ Corporations 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jamie Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ever Victory Technology Limited v. SAS Group, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00486
Plaintiff:
Ever Victory Technology Limited
Defendant:
SAS Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
The Nativity Stone Collection, LLC v. SAS Group, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03073
Defendant:
SAS Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Nativity Stone Collection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Versatile Housewares & Gardening Systems, Inc. v. SAS Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2016mc00008
Plaintiff:
Versatile Housewares & Gardening Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
SAS Group, Inc. , Scott Sobo and Thomas Motosko
Kogan v. SAS Group
as 1:2014cv09551
Plaintiff:
Ellen Kogan
Defendant:
SAS Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Petjamas LLC v. Jordan Drew Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02708
Plaintiff:
Petjamas LLC
Defendant:
Jordan Drew Corporation and SAS Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SAS Institute Inc. v. SAS Groupe
as 5:2012cv00494
Plaintiff:
SAS Institute Inc.
Defendant:
SAS Groupe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
