Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HOLLADAY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00915
Plaintiff:
MARK J. PRATT, BRAD LEE SCHWARZ, SONJA RUHREN and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY and others
Interested Party:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
NLRB v. Schwarz Partners Packaging, LL
as 15-1235
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Schwarz Partners Packaging, LLC, doing business as MaxPak
Schwarz Partners Packaging v. NLRB
as 15-1203
Petitioner:
Schwarz Partners Packaging, LLC, doing business as MaxPak
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
WILLIAMS v. WYETH LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
RICKY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WYETH LLC , WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , PFIZER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Bregman v. Steven Perles, et al
as 12-7091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael J. Bregman
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven R. Perles, Thomas Fortune Fay and Paul W. Schwarz
BREGMAN v. PERLES et al
as 1:2011cv01886
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. BREGMAN
Defendant:
STEVEN R. PERLES, THOMAS FORTUNE FAY and PAUL W. SCHWARZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COPEMANN v. SCHWARZE et al
as 1:2010cv01828
Plaintiff:
DALE A. COPEMANN
Defendant:
JENNIFER SCHWARZE and CITIFINANCIAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ICON INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. STEINBERG et al
as 1:2007cv02342
Plaintiff:
ICON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID A. STEINBERG, ANDREW ZEINFELD and KENNETH D. SCHWARZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wallace, Katherine v. Skadden Arps Slate, et al
as 03-7026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Katherine T. Wallace
Defendant - Appellee:
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
