Cases 1 - 10 of 1,045
Hartsfield v. United States Army
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hartsfield
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Miller v Communications Resource, Inc. Wrap Benefit Plan
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Samuel Scott Miller
Defendant:
Communications Resource, Inc. Wrap Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Shelia R. Scott
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Scott v. Ross, et al.
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Alicia Scott
Defendant:
Alan Ross and Randall Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Campbell v. Richmond City Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center, Officer Tylor and Officer Mertaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
