Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mosgrove v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Tom Mosgrove
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, City of Morgan Hill, Scott Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01952
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Martin
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2017cv04896
Plaintiff:
Tyler Scott Martin and Marisa Mercedes Martin
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
William Michael Hicks , Kenneth Harms , Matthew Achatz and others
Defendant:
PGA Tour, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Kenneth Corsino et al v. Perkins & Marie Callender's, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00692
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Corsino , Ricardo Sanchez , Jeremy Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Perkins & Marie Callender's, Inc. , Marie Callender Pie Shops, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Anthony, et al v. Benefield et al
as 2:2010cv00689
Defendant:
Jonothan Benefield, Julie Benefield and Walnut Hill Estate Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff:
Angela Anthony , John Anthony , Joseph Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
People of the State of California et al v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. et al
as 3:2007cv01883
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California and The City of San Diego
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Kinder Morgan Management, L.L.C., SFFP, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment (Declaration of Purpose)
Martin v. Nvidia Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv03217
Plaintiff:
Scott Martin, Scott Martin, Scott Martin and others
Defendant:
Nvidia Corporation, ATI Technologies, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
