Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SELTZ v. SWEPI LP
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
CAROL SPELLMAN SELTZ, SUMNER R. BEMIS, GEORGENE BEMIS and others
Defendant:
SWEPI LP, SWEPI LLC, SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
SMERKAR et al v. SWEPI, LP et al
as 1:2020cv00066
Plaintiff:
DENNIS RAY BOOCKS, ANGELA DAWN BOOCKS and THOMAS J. SMERKAR
Defendant:
SWEPI, LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARNER et al v. SWEPI, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. ZINK, JOHN L. STEWART, GILDA GIANCOLA and others
Defendant:
SWEPI, LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Walney, et al v. SWEPI LP, et al
as 19-8013
Petitioner:
RODNEY A. BEDOW, SR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and THOMAS J. WALNEY
Respondent:
SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP LLC and SWEPI LP
JONES v. SWEPI LP et al
as 2:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
ROSA JONES
Defendant:
BARBARA KINNAN, RICHARD KINNAN, SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. SWEPI LP et al
as 2:2016cv00999
Plaintiff:
Matt A. Rogers
Defendant:
SWEPI LP and Shell Energy Holding GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Walney, et al v. SWEPI LP, et al
as 15-8096
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
THOMAS J. WALNEY and RODNEY A. BEDOW, SR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
SWEPI LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP LLC
Thomas Walney, et al v. Swepi LLC, et al
as 15-8093
Plaintiff - Respondent:
THOMAS J. WALNEY and RODNEY A. BEDOW, SR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP LLC and SWEPI LP
WALNEY v. SWEPI LP et al
as 1:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. WALNEY
Defendant:
SWEPI LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
