Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re: McIntosh County, Georgia v. Sarah Drayton, et al
as 22-11298
Petitioner:
In re: MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA
Respondent:
SARAH FRANCES DRAYTON, CAROLYN BANKS, MELVIN BANKS, SR. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Emmanuel Edokobi v. U. S. General Services Admin
as 19-2232
Defendant / Appellee:
NACIEVE OWENS, In HIs Personal and Official Capacities, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, DONNIE BAXTER and others
Defendant:
RUSHERN BAKER, III, In His Personal Capacities, JAMES DAILEY, DEPARTMENT OF PERMITTING, INSPECTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Edokobi v. U.S. General Services Administration et al
as 8:2017cv02469
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Edokobi
Defendant:
U.S. General Services Administration, Timothy Horne, Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Shirley Grant
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 2:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton, Carolyn Banks, Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Intervenor:
United States
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Grant v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv00303
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grant v. Alderman
as 3:2007cv00395
Plaintiff:
Shirley Grant and Shirley Grant
Defendant:
Wesley J Alderman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
