Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10616
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SHOAF v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN SHOAF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shoaf v. JCG Foods of Alabama LLC
as 4:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Christy Shoaf
Defendant:
JCG Foods of Alabama LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
SHOAF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07521
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY SHOAF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHOAF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv81833
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SHOAF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHOAF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv81834
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHOAF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHOAF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60854
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SHOAF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHOAF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv48779
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MATTHEW SHOAF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHOAF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23673
Plaintiff:
TROY SHOAF
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03275
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRANZ, JASON MENDEZ, THAD TANAKA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
