Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Thrive Hood River et al v. Loftsgaarden et al
as 3:2022cv01981
Plaintiff:
Thrive Hood River, Oregon Wild, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Meta Loftsgaarden and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Greater Hells Canyon Council et al v. Wilkes et al
as 2:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Greater Hells Canyon Council, Oregon Wild, Central Oregon LandWatch and others
Defendant:
Homer Wilkes, Glenn Casamassa and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Audubon Society of Portland et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
as 3:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
Conservation Northwest, Cascadia Wildlands, Audubon Society of Portland and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
WildEarth Guardians et al v. Forson et al
as 2:2017cv01004
Defendant:
Stacey L. Forson and United States Forest Service
Plaintiff:
Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Oregon Wild, The Sierra Club and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Bark et al v. Northrop et al
as 3:2013cv00828
Plaintiff:
Bark, Friends of Mount Hood, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and others
Defendant:
Kent Connaughton, Lisa Northrop, United States Forest Service and others
Intervenor Defendant:
RLK and Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Oregon Wild et al v. Connaughton et al
as 1:2012cv02244
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Oregon Wild and Sierra Club
Defendant:
Kent Connaughton and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
National Wildlife Federation et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2001cv00640
Plaintiff:
American Rivers, Inc., Columbia Riverkeeper, Federation of Fly Fishers and others
Unknown:
Aaron C. Courtney, Aaron C. Courtney, Aaron C. Courtney and others
Intervenor Defendant:
BPA Customer Group, Franklin County Farm Bureau Federation, Grant County Farm Bureau Federation and others
Amicu:
Center for Tribal Water Advocacy, Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association, Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and others
503) 222-2301 (fax:
Clarkston Golf & Country Club
406) 675-4665 (fax:
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and Joseph P. Hovenkotter
509) 634-2387 (fax:
Stephen H. Suagee
206) 448-0962 (fax:
John B Arum
541) 737-3590 (fax:
Dr. Howard F. Horton, Ph.D.
410) 230-1389 (fax:
Timothy M. Sullivan
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, State of Washington, U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers and others
208) 667-4695 (fax:
Shannon D. Work
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Oregon
206) 623-4986 (fax:
Matthew A. Love and Matthew A. Love
360) 586-3454 (fax:
Sheila D. Lynch and Sheila D. Lynch
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
League of Wilderness Defenders-Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project
as 2:2009cv01023
Plaintiff:
League of Wilderness Defenders-Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project, League of Wilderness Defenders-Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Kevin Martin and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Sierra Club et al v. Coos County et al
as 6:2003cv01697
Defendant:
Clark Besack, Coos County, John Griffith and others
410) 230-1389 (fax:
Timothy M. Sullivan, Timothy M. Sullivan, Timothy M. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Coos County Coalition, Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Project and Sierra Club
Consol Defendant:
MasTec, Inc.
503) 727-2222 (fax:
Julia E. Markley
Movant:
Project Advisor
Consol Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Oregon Wild et al v. Shepard et al
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild, Oregon Wild, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center and others
Defendant:
Edward W. Shepard, United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
