Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Skidmore v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James M. Skidmore
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Galanti v. SWVRJA-Duffield Facility et al
as 7:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Christopher Galanti
Defendant:
SWVRJA-Duffield Facility, Wexford Health Services, Dr. Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Thacker v. Scott et al
as 7:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Justin Alan Thacker
Defendant:
Nurse Scott, Nurse Hale, Nurse Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skidmore v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
as 3:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Skidmore
Respondent:
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Skidmore v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00356
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
James M. Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Morris et al v. Truist Bank, Successor by Merger to Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) et al
as 1:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Successor by Merger to Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T), Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank
Plaintiff:
Linda Morris, Margaret Morris Sublett, Kenneth C Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shazly v. Lukjan Metal Products Inc et al
as 3:2020cv03882
Defendant:
Vernon N Skidmore, Jr and Lukjan Metal Products Inc
Plaintiff:
Tarek M Shazly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Skidmore v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00112
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jack Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Tammy Skidmore v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 19-2482
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, a Virginia corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMMY A. SKIDMORE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
