Cases 1 - 10 of 299
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC. v. Ateto et al
as 7:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
Defendant:
Philip Ateto, Barkha Bhandari, Joel Davis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Sloan v. Court
as 7:2023cv00745
Petitioner:
Claude Sloan
Respondent:
Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carolina Landmark Realty, LLC v. Vincent Lineberger
as 23-2159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLINA LANDMARK REALTY, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
VINCENT LINEBERGER
3Rd Party Defendant:
WARREN SLOAN GOFORTH
Shinn v. Gofourth
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Shinn
Defendant:
Sloan Gofourth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sloan v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Sloan
Defendant:
Google LLC and Allied Universal Security Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Brett v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv04535
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Robert Rochinel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carolina Landmark Realty, LLC v. Lineberger
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Carolina Landmark Realty, LLC
Defendant:
Vincent Lineberger
3Rd Party Defendant:
Warren Sloan Goforth
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
