Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MCCLESKEY, et al v. SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
as 1:2018cv01431
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE
Defendant:
SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MCCLESKEY et al v. SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
as 1:2014cv02127
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY
Defendant:
SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MARK MCCLESKEY et al v. SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
as 1:2014cv00966
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY
Defendant:
SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MCCLESKEY et al v. SOMMERS.
as 1:2012cv00811
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE
Defendant:
SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MCCLESKEY et al v. SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
as 1:2009cv00860
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MCCLESKEY et al v. SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
as 1:2008cv00410
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCLESKEY et al v. SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
as 1:2007cv00177
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
SOMMERS PLASTERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.