Cases 1 - 10 of 12
John Castro v. Donald Trump
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, SC ELECTIONS COMMISSION, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HOWARD M. KNAPP and SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY
Castro v. Donald John Trump et al
as 3:2023cv04501
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
SC Elections Commission, Executive Director Howard M. Knapp, Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shernoff et al v. Andino et al
as 2:2020cv03654
Defendant:
Clifford J Edler, Scott Moseley, Howard M Knapp and others
Plaintiff:
DSCC and JoAnn Shernoff
Intervenor Defendant:
South Carolina Republican Party and Speaker of the South James H. Lucas
Interested Party:
Albertus Clea, Family Unit, George Hopkins and others
Petitioner:
Senator Harvey Peeler and James ("Jay") H. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kylon Middleton v. Marci Andino
as 20-2022
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES H. LUCAS, Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives and HARVEY PEELER, in his capacity as President of the South Carolina Senate
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT MOSELEY, in his official capacity as member of the South Carolina Election Commission, MARCI ANDINO, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, JOHN WELLS, in his official capacity as Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMOS WELLS, ERNESTINE MOORE, TONYA WINBUSH and others
Intervenor:
SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY
Thomas et al v. Andino et al
as 3:2020cv01552
Plaintiff:
Family Unit Inc, The, Dr Brenda Williams, Trena Walker and others
Defendant:
Scott Moseley, Henry D McMaster, Marci Andino and others
Intervenor:
South Carolina Republican Party
Interested Party:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
Attorney General Alan Wilson and Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DE LA FUENTE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv03753
Defendant:
Arizona Republican Party, Georgia Republican Party, Washington Republican Party and others
Plaintiff:
ROQUE DE LA FUENTE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Coyne v. South Carolina Secretary of State et al
as 3:2015cv03669
Plaintiff:
Thomas Joseph Coyne
Defendant:
South Carolina Secretary of State and South Carolina Republican Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenville County Republican P v. Greenville County Election Com
as 13-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREENVILLE COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, a/k/a Greenville County Republican Executive Committee and WILLIAM MITCHELL, a/k/a Billy Mitchell
Plaintiff:
SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, PATRICK B. HADDON, in his official capacity as the Chairman of the Greenville County Republican Party and BETTY S. POE, in her official capacity as the Chairman of the Greenville County Republican Party
Defendant - Appellee:
GREENVILLE COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, GREENVILLE COUNTY BOARD OF REGISTRATION and BILLY WAY, JR., in his official capacity as the Chairman of the South Carolina State Election Commission
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JOHN H. HUDGENS, III, in his official capacity as the Chairman of the South Carolina State Election Committee and CITY OF GREENVILLE MUNICIPAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE GRIFFIN, REGINALD GRIFFIN, BRETT A. BURSEY and others
Williams v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al
as 2:2012cv02760
Plaintiff:
Reginald Williams
Defendant:
South Carolina State Election Commission , Marci Andino , Charleston County Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 - Voting Rights Act of 1965
Donald Jones v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 10-7124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Bobby Jindal, Governor, State of Louisiana, Sue P. Everhart, Republican Party of Louisiana and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
