Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Murkowski et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Frank H. Murkowski, The Southeast Conference, The City of Ketchikan and others
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, United States Department of Agriculture, Xochitl Small and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Whistle Blower Law
SEACC, et al v. USFS, et al
as 15-35232
:
In re: BIG THORNE PROJECT AND 2008 TONGASS FOREST PLAN
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Plaintiff:
CASCADIA WILDLANDS, GREATER SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COMMUNITY, GREENPEACE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, BETH PENDLETON, in her officially capacity as United States Forest Service Region 10 Regional Forester and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA, ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, INC., SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE and others
State of Alaska v. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 13-5151
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Alaska
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Alaska Electric Light & Power, Alaska Power & Telephone, Alaska Miners Association and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, Thomas L. Tidwell, in his official capacity as Chief, Forest Service and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Alaska Forest Association and Southeast Conference
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Alaska Center for the Environment, Boat Company and others
State of Alaska v. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 13-5150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Alaska
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alaska Electric Light & Power, Alaska Power & Telephone, Alaska Miners Association and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southeast Alaska Power Agency
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, Thomas L. Tidwell, in his official capacity as Chief, Forest Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Alaska Center for the Environment, Boat Company and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Alaska Forest Association and Southeast Conference
State of Alaska v. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 13-5147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Alaska
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Alaska Electric Light & Power, Alaska Power & Telephone, Alaska Miners Association and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, Thomas L. Tidwell, in his official capacity as Chief, Forest Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Alaska Center for the Environment, Boat Company and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Alaska Forest Association and Southeast Conference
SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE et al v. SCHAEFER et al
as 1:2008cv01598
Plaintiff:
SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE, KETCHIKAN GATEWAY BOROUGH, CITY OF KETCHIKAN and others
Defendant:
EDWARD SCHAEFER, MARK REY, ABIGAIL KIMBELL and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Southeast Alaska, et al v. USACE, et al
as 06-35679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TIMOTHY J. GALLAGHER, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, LARRY L. REEDER, in his official capacity of Chief of the Regulatory Branch and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
COEUR ALASKA, INC., GOLDBELT, INC. and STATE OF ALASKA
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN RIVERS, CLEAN WATER ACTION NETWORK, COOK INLETKEEPER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
