Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Garey v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00547
Defendant:
Clint Sonnier, Candice Jackson, Leonard Jones, . and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Dinkins v. Frank Lara, et al
as 19-40809
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA MALLET, JOHN DOE, Chief of Psychology Department, SHARA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DINKINS
Dinkins v. Lara et al
as 1:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Shara Johnson, Frank Lara, Stephen Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
James Dinkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOTTON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, SHARON MILLER, Issam Harmoush and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTTON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOTTON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv01693
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTTON, II and CHARLES MOTTON, III
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC WOOTEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gladney v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2018cv00293
Plaintiff:
Edward J Gladney
Defendant:
United States of America, Dallas B Jones, J Harter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv02980
Plaintiff:
Hoctabiano Campos
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Inch, Edmund Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinkins v. Lara et al
as 6:2016cv01002
Plaintiff:
James Dinkins
Defendant:
Frank Lara, Sreedhar Polavarapu, S Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Womble et al
as 1:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferguson v. Womble et al
as 1:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rashaad Ferguson
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
