Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Baker v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10255
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Theodore R. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Devine v Saul
as 1:2021cv10129
Plaintiff:
Zachary Devine
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dasilva Monteiro v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12189
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dasilva Monteiro
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12129
Plaintiff:
Chanel Taishea Smith
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Asanovsky v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01689
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Alija Asanovsky
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
NELSON v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv06124
Defendant:
SSA COMMISSIONER ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
KATOSHA NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ryans v. Saul
as 1:2020cv11823
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ryans
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Shadd v. Saul
as 4:2020cv12095
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shadd
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ambrose v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv04763
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
Tammy Ambrose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Tuttle v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30064
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Tuttle
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
