Cases 1 - 10 of 1,041
DOE I et al v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 1:2025cv01261
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE I, JANE DOE I, JOHN DOE II and others
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
National Labor Relations Board v. Starbucks Corporation
as 25-911
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv04112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jones v. Starbucks Store #3439 et al
as 4:2025cv00165
Plaintiff:
Angela Jones
Defendant:
Starbucks Store #3439, Starbucks Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lyons v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company
as 4:2025cv01511
Plaintiff:
Tynikia Lyons
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McCray v. Starbucks Corporation
as 5:2025cv00802
Plaintiff:
LeShawn McCray
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LeShawn McCray v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 5:2025cv00803
Plaintiff:
LeShawn McCray
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Seibel v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2025cv00478
Plaintiff:
Elyssa Seibel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Campos v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company
as 7:2025cv00125
Plaintiff:
Carlos Campos
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company and Edinburg Properties, LLC
Cross-Plaintiff:
Edinburg Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
