Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biggers v. The State of Texas
as 23-7784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENESHA BIGGERS
Plaintiff:
M.F., A minor and Z.S., A minor
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF TEXAS, NEW YORK ACS, EL PASO CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
In re: Google LLC
as 23-910
Petitioner:
Google, LLC
Respondent:
The State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
United States of America v. Pharmerica Corporation
as 23-909
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, The State of Alaska and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ex rel. Kaveh Askari
Defendant / Appellee:
PharMerica Corporation, Pharmacy Corporation of America, Oncomed Specialty Pharmacy, LTD., DBA Onco360 and others
Defendant:
DEF, David Froessel, Jeff Kimmel and others
Hulinsky v. County of Westchester County Department of Public
as 23-804
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Sally Roe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
40 Days for Life, a nonprofit corporation of the State of Texas, White Plains 40 Days for Life, as unincorporated association of the State of New York, Oksana Hulinsky and others
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Westchester
Defendant:
County of Westchester County Department of Public Safety, Terrance Raynor, Acting Commissioner of the Westchester Department of Public Safety, in his official capacity, New Rochelle Police Department and others
United States of America v. McKesson Corporation
as 23-726
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, ex rel, State of California, ex rel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hart
Defendant / Appellee:
McKesson Corporation, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, Collectively and McKesson Specialty Care Distrobution Corportaion, Collectively, DBA McKesson Specialty Health
Defendant:
DEF and McKesson Specialty Care Distribution JV LLC, FKA McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Joint Venture LP
Brickman v. Dave et al
as 1:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Brickman
Defendant:
Dr. Mahesh Dave, City of College Station, Texas and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Hulinsky v. County of Westchester County Department of Public
as 23-155
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Sally Roe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
40 Days for Life, a nonprofit corporation of the State of Texas, White Plains 40 Days for Life, as unincorporated association of the State of New York, Oksana Hulinsky and others
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Westchester
Defendant:
County of Westchester County Department of Public Safety, Terrance Raynor, acting Commissioner of the Westchester Department of Public Safety, in his official capacity, New Rochelle Police Department and others
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
