Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Walter Chruby v. Kirk Bearjar, et al
as 24-1200
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. CHRUBY
Defendant:
KIRK BEARJAR, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, JENNIFER SHROCK and others
Michael Dukes v. Stephanie Wood, et al
as 23-1711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DUKES
Defendant / Appellee:
E.M.S.A. HSA STEPHANIE WOOD and MEDICAL PROVIDER RACHEL MEDLOCK
Jerome Washington v. Gilmore, et al
as 23-1639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER, PA-C, CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, BSN, MBA, CCHP and others
Michael Dukes v. Stephanie Wood, et al
as 22-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DUKES
Defendant / Appellee:
E.M.S.A. HSA STEPHANIE WOOD and MEDICAL PROVIDER RACHEL MEDLOCK
LAFFEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS LAFFEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPOZZA, CO I EMMINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YELVERTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. YELVERTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHAN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DUKES v. WOOD et al
as 2:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUKES
Defendant:
E.M.S.A. HSA STEPHANIE WOOD and MEDICAL PROVIDER RACHEL MEDLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FERREIRAS v. RICE-GREGO et al
as 2:2020cv01686
Defendant:
CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, RN CARTER, RN MARK JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FERREIRAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
REAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv01284
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL OFFICE, SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY and others
Petitioner:
ACEY REAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GOODMAN v. MICELI et al
as 2:2020cv01259
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, BETH RUDZIEMSKI, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE I. GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
