Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Warren v. CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
Quennel D. Warren
Defendant:
CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC, CorrectHealth, LLC, Millenia Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STERLING v. PAULDING STATE COURT
as 4:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JAMAINE STERLING
Respondent:
PAULDING STATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STERLING v. PAULDING STATE COURT
as 4:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JAMAINE STERLING
Respondent:
PAULDING STATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sterling Icon Cartersville LLC v. Gray
as 4:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Sterling Icon Cartersville LLC doing business as Icon Cartersville
Defendant:
Roshon Gray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv01980
Plaintiff:
Oscar Johnson
Defendant:
Sterling Jones, Landstar Ranger, Inc. and Old Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
