Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Edwards et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22663
Plaintiff:
Douglas T. Edwards and Mobile World View Technologies, Innovations, Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc. , Harshaw Research, Inc., Dale J Ream and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Wang v. Jobs et al
as 5:2013cv04190
Plaintiff:
Li Feng Wang
Defendant:
Steve Jobs, Steve Jobs' Estate Executor, Laurene Powell Jobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sukit Kumvachirapitag v. Bill Gates, et al
as 12-17696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUKIT KUMVACHIRAPITAG
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL GATES, STEVE JOBS, WARREN BUFFET and others
Kumvachirapitag v. Gates et al
as 3:2012cv05075
Plaintiff:
Sukit Kumvachirapitag
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sukit Kumvachirapitag v. Bill Gates, et al
as 12-16466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUKIT KUMVACHIRAPITAG
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL GATES, STEVE JOBS, WARREN BUFFET and others
Sukit Kumvachirapitag v. Bill Gates, et al
as 11-17659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUKIT KUMVACHIRAPITAG
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL GATES, STEVE JOBS, WARREN BUFFET and others
Kumvachirapitag v. Gates et al
as 3:2011cv04510
Plaintiff:
Sukit Kumvachirapitag
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kumvachirapitag v. Gates et al
as 4:2011cv04510
Plaintiff:
Sukit Kumvachirapitag
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kumvachirapitag v. Gates et al
as 3:2011cv04405
Plaintiff:
Sukit Kumvachirapitag
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. ABC et al
as 1:2010cv07259
Plaintiff:
Viki Dream Bailey
Defendant:
ABC Robin Roberts, Apple Steve Jobs, Canesta James Spare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
