Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Rivers v. Erickson et al
as 1:2023cv03233
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers, Jr.
Defendant:
Rachael Erickson, Rachael (I) Erickson, Polly Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv60972
Plaintiff:
Steven Bernard Powell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McClendon v. Bernard et al
as 4:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
Juan McClendon
Defendant:
Steven Bernard, Charisse Childers and Arkansas Division of Workforce Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pallett v. State of Washington
as 2:2021cv00006
Respondent:
State of Washington
Petitioner:
Steven Bernard Pallett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRADDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19852
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BERNARD BRADDY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Pierre v. State of Florida, et al
as 20-12018
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN BERNARD PIERRE
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45051
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BERNARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernard v. Native American Affairs of Washington D.C.
as 6:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Native American Affairs of Washington D.C.
Plaintiff:
Steven Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2020cv20421
Defendant:
State of Florida and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Plaintiff:
Steven Bernard Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manus v. Hill et al
as 1:2019cv00350
Plaintiff:
Steven Bernard Manus and Steven Bernard-Manus
Defendant:
Andrea R Trevino, Haley Hunter, Curtis Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
