Cases 1 - 10 of 59
PEW v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. Glunt et al
as 3:2015cv01503
Plaintiff:
Devon Frye
Defendant:
Steven R. Glunt, Nathaniel Wilt and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. PA State Attorney General et al
as 4:2015cv01226
Petitioner:
Myles White
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Steven R. Glunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDWARDS v. CO JOHN DOE et al
as 3:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
CALVIN EDWARDS
Defendant:
CO JOHN DOE, VINCENT DEFELICE, LT. SHEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. Glunt et al
as 3:2015cv01071
Plaintiff:
Devon Frye
Defendant:
Steven R. Glunt, Nathaniel Wilt, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOK v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2015cv02794
Petitioner:
CHANTHA J. TOK
Respondent:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2015cv01986
Petitioner:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Respondent:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2015cv00781
Petitioner:
HENRY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vidmosko v. Glunt et al
as 1:2015cv00288
Petitioner:
Allen M. Vidmosko
Respondent:
Steven R. Glunt , The PA Attorney General and District Attorney of Lackawanna County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flemister v. Glunt et al
as 1:2015cv00187
Petitioner:
Vincent Lee Flemister
Respondent:
Steven R. Glunt and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
