Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mosley v. Reiser
as 24-60148
Plaintiff:
Roy Campanella Mosley
Defendant:
Steven Reiser, Warden, K. Lemos, Camp Administrator and B. Webbs, Case Manager
Mosley v. Reiser
as 22-60625
Petitioner / Appellant:
Roy Mosley
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Steven Reiser
Mosley v. Reiser et al
as 3:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Roy Campanella Mosley
Defendant:
Warden Steven Reiser, Camp Administrator K. Lemos and Case Manager B. Webbs
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mosley v. Reiser
as 3:2021cv00394
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Steven Reiser
Plaintiff:
Roy Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wallace v. Reiser
as 21-60463
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andre Lyneal Wallace
Respondent / Appellee:
Marcus Martin, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex Low and Steven Reiser, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex Low
Silva v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00267
Defendant:
Warden Steven Reiser and United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Tomas Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lee v. Reiser
as 3:2020cv00713
Defendant:
Warden Steven Reiser
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Calmes v. Reiser
as 3:2020cv00668
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Cedric L. Calmes
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden Steven Reiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bouterse v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Paula A. Wolff, Archie B. Longley, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Dino Delano Bouterse
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Attorney Fred A. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lee v. Reiser
as 3:2020cv00339
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Steven Reiser
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
