Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Myron Moton v. Wetzel, et al
as 20-2432
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, DAVY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
Myron Moton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2773
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. SWIFT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
MOTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT, DORINE VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
MYRON MOTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv01304
Defendant:
Deputy Mazukiewiez, Lieutenant Supervised Cell Extraction Team Unit, Dorine Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGNER v. WIGGINS et al
as 3:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
QASHIME WAGNER
Defendant:
SHAWN WIGGINS, SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD, CAPTAIN SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKENSON v. VARNER et al
as 3:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
ASMAR DICKENSON
Defendant:
DORINA VARNER, RYAN BRANT, SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD, SGT. PAULSON, MAJOR GRUBB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOLF v. SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD et al
as 3:2016cv00059
Petitioner:
PAUL B. WOLF
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAGER v. SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD
as 3:2015cv00334
Plaintiff:
RONALD RAY RAGER
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOLF v. SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00311
Petitioner:
PAUL B. WOLF
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT WINGARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
