Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Rodrick Brayboy v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 25-1720
Plaintiff:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Jesse Engram v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 25-1627
Plaintiff:
JESSE ENGRAM
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Samuel Marrero-Nardo, Sr. v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 25-1525
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL FRANK MARRERO-NARDO, SR.
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEBANON COUNTY
Rodrick Brayboy v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 25-1258
Plaintiff:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Walid Muhammad v. Scott, et al
as 25-1122
Petitioner:
WALID A. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
CO SCOTT, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Samuel Garcia v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 24-3285
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL GARCIA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Tashawn Hunter v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-3182
Plaintiff:
TASHAWN K. HUNTER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DENNIS WIEDERHOLD
Michael Burton v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 24-3136
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BURTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Sharif Layton v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 24-2970
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Plaintiff:
SHARIF LAYTON
James Bryant v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 24-2811
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRYANT
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
