Cases
Cases 51 - 56 of 56
NELSON v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-HUNTINGDON et al
as 2:2007cv01453
Petitioner: ERNEST JAMAL NELSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-HUNTINGDON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANCHAS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HUNTINGDON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01112
Petitioner: DANIEL BERNARD MANCHAS, III
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HUNTINGDON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manchas v. Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon et al
as 3:2007cv01439
Petitioner: Daniel Bernard Manchas, III
Respondent: Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Superintendent of SCI-Huntingdon et al
as 1:2007cv01325
Petitioner: Ernest Jamal Nelson
Respondent: Superintendent of SCI-Huntingdon and Attorney General Of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-HUNTINGDON et al
as 2:2007cv01249
Petitioner: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-HUNTINGDON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer v. Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00496
Petitioner: Derrick Cramer
Respondent: Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, District Attorney For York County Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?