Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Ronald Poe v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-3200
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEE POE
Joseph Amoop v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-3032
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. AMOOP, a/k/a ANOOP MICHAEL JOSEPH
Laquam Smith v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2648
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
LAQUAM MALIK SMITH
Gregory Barto v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-2235
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A. BARTO
Spencer Wallace v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-2147
Plaintiff:
SPENCER WALLACE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Edwin Romero v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2105
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Donte Cannon v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-2074
Plaintiff:
DONTE CANNON
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Edwin Romero v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2015
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1972
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Omar Miller v. Superintendent Rockview SCI
as 24-1947
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Plaintiff:
OMAR MILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
