Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv01474
Plaintiff:
Kulwinder Singh
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Director of USCIS Tracy Renaud, District Director Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gicharu v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Samuel Kinuthia Gicharu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Martin O'Malley, David T. Wesling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Precious Owusu Boateng et al v. Kathy A. Baran et al
as 8:2023cv02462
Defendant:
Edwin Farin, Kathy A. Baran, USCIS California Service Center and others
Plaintiff:
Precious Owusu Boateng
Petitioner:
Tracy Tarango
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
