Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Vick v. Hospira, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02666
Defendant: Actavis LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Susan Vick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VICK v. HOSPIRA INC. et al
as 3:2020cv06487
Defendant: SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, SARGENT PHARMACEUTICAL INC and others
Plaintiff: SUSAN VICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Vick v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv11429
Plaintiff: Susan Vick
Defendant: Hospira, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2035
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Davis, Jr. v. Susan Vick
as 15-2021
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, next best friend of J.F.D., a Minor Child
Defendant - Appellee: SUSAN VICK, Attorney Advocate for the Wake County Guardian Ad Litem program Individually and in her official capacities and CHARLOTTE MITCHELL, Guardian Ad Litem Individually and in her official Capacities
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-7355
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor, MELANIE A. SHEKITA and others
William Davis v. Charlotte Mitchel
as 15-1972
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff: J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
William S. Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2081
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
William Scott Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2552
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel
as 12-2133
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?