Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Coil v. Wolfson et al
as 2:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Coil
Defendant:
Steven B. Wolfson, Samuel Martiney, Christopher Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David Coil v. USDC-NVL
as 23-70027
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID COIL, STATE OF NEVADA, SANDOVAL, Governor and others
Petitioner:
DAVID COIL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Coil v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv02120
Plaintiff:
David Coil
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Governor Sandoval, Governor Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Saitas et al
as 4:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Robert Alvarez
Defendant:
Ricardo Saitas doing business as Mojo Mechanical Heating & Cooling, Unknown Saitas named as Jane Doe Saitas doing business as Mojo Mechanical Heating & Cooling, Ricardo Saitas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shaw et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01574
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kathy Shaw, Stanley Keim, Hazel Wehrle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Instagram, Kyle ? (App Official From Ohio), App and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Prayton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAITA v. CORTUK et al
as 3:2017cv06949
Plaintiff:
MARINA CORNELIA SAITA
Defendant:
KAMURAN CORTUK , YESIM CORTUK SAKARYA and WESTPOINT INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Olausen v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00315
Respondent:
Board of Nevada Prison Commissioners, Chery, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Petitioner:
John Steven Olausen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
