Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gateway Square, LLC v. Saks & Company, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00274
Defendant:
Saks & Company, LLC doing business as Saks Fifth Avenue Off Fifth and Saks, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gateway Square, LLC
Counter Plaintiff:
Saks Incorporated and Saks & Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. Saks, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00613
Plaintiff:
Yaman F. Taylor
Defendant:
Saks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Johnson Hung v. Saks, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10594
Defendant:
Saks, Inc. dba Saks Off Fifth, Saks & Company, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Johnson Hung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Unicolors Inc v. Macy's Inc., et al
as 2:2014cv08611
Defendant:
4 Playbk Inc, Ah Ha LLC, Altitude and others
Plaintiff:
Unicolors Inc
Intervenor Defendant:
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Everlina Laurice Harp v. Laurice El Badry Rahme, et al
as 13-4808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERLINA LAURICE HARP, T/D/B/A Everlina & Laurice, Everlina, and Laurice
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURICE EL BADRY RAHME, LAURICE EL BADRY RAHME LTD and SAKS INC, TDBA Saks Fifth Avenue
Lodsys Group, LLC v. Crocs, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc. , Oriental Trading Company, Inc. , Saks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Beale v. Alexis Bittar, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07902
Plaintiff:
Eva Marie Beale
Defendant:
Alexis Bittar, Inc., A Jewelry Wonderland, Alene Too, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
