Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Scott et al v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott and Samuel Ryan West
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds, Cpl. FNU Jones, Sgt. FNU Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ryan West
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds, Cpl. FNU Jones, Sgt. FNU Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Unknown Comal County Cert OFC et al
as 5:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ryan West
Defendant:
Unknown Comal County Cert OFC and Sgt. Ebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diemel et al v. Tolley
as 1:2021cv00931
Plaintiff:
Brandon Diemel, Brandon Diemel Livestock, LLC and Brandon Diemel Livestock LLC
Defendant:
Meghan Tolley as Personal Representative of The Estate of Samuel Ryan Tolley and Meghan Tolley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv40042
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL RYAN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan v. Wang
as 3:2018cv05708
Defendant:
Shengyang Wang
Plaintiff:
Wade Samuel Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuel Ryan v. Maggie Miller-Stout
as 17-35595
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL RYAN
Respondent - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT
In re: Samuel F. Ryan
as 14-4491
Petitioner:
In re: SAMUEL RYAN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Samuel Ryan v. Warden New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 14-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR OF NEW JERSEY
Ryan v. Miller-Stout
as 2:2012cv00727
Petitioner:
Samuel Ryan
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
