Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Coleman v. Charles et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Coleman
Defendant:
Sandra Charles, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Charles et al
as 3:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Earl Bradley
Defendant:
Sandra Charles, Doe, Byron Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cheshire Medical Department
as 3:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson
Defendant:
Chesire Medical Department, Cheshire Medical Department, Richard Kao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Richeson
as 22-381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Robert Richeson, Kathleen Maurer, individually and officially, Kirsten Shea, individually and officially and others
Benner v. Alves et al
as 1:2021cv12080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Benner
Defendant:
Nelson Alves, Classification Disciplinary Board, DOC Legal Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Richeson
as 21-2945
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Robert Richeson, Kathleen Maurer, individually and officially, Kirsten Shea, individually and officially and others
Charles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01656
Plaintiff:
Sandra Charles
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chimney v. Quiros et al
as 3:2021cv00321
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ann, Nurse and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Chimney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Lamont et al
as 3:2021cv00143
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Carson Wright, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray et al v. City Of New York, New York
as 1:2016cv08072
Plaintiff:
Murray, Susana Diaz, Candace Radford and others
Defendant:
City Of New York and City Of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
