Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Nelson v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06103
Plaintiff:
James Nelson
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Sandra Doorley, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Roosevelt Smith, Elizabeth Buckley, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Doorley et al
as 6:2015cv06755
Plaintiff:
Andre Barnes
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley, Esq., Christine Callanan, Esq., Christine Seppeler, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Brooks et al
as 6:2015cv06327
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Thomas
Defendant:
Maggie Brooks, Sandra Doorley, Francis Affronti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Rochester Police Department et al
as 6:2015cv06284
Plaintiff:
Otis B. Willis, Jr.
Defendant:
Rochester Police Department, City of Rochester - Mayor Lovely Warren, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. McNamara et al
as 6:2015cv06229
Plaintiff:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
James McNamara, John VanLoon, Richard Fontanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. DeMarco et al
as 6:2015cv06179
Plaintiff:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
John L. DeMarco, Sandra Doorley and Stephen X. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Brooks et al
as 1:2014cv00833
Plaintiff:
Isiah Williams
Defendant:
Maggie Brooks, Cheryl Dinolfo, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeMarco et al v. Crenshaw
as 6:2014cv06169
Respondent:
John L. DeMarco and Sandra Doorley
Petitioner:
William Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Siersma et al
as 1:2013cv00730
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Robert Siersma, Samuel Soprano, Eric J. Hurd, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.