Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Noel v. Doorley et al
as 6:2021cv06737
Plaintiff:
Negrito Paul Noel
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley, John Marsella, Michael Dean Kroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figueroa v. Doorley et al
as 6:2021cv06351
Defendant:
David Swain, Sandra Doorley, Joseph E. Birganti and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Javier Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Assistant District Attorney et al
as 6:2019cv06449
Defendant:
Director of Parole Colaprete, Sandra Doorley, Parole Officer Gowick and others
Plaintiff:
Vidal Maurice Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Troche et al
as 6:2018cv06932
Defendant:
Jason Vaughn, Sandra Doorley, Rochester Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
James Dean Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Town of Brighton et al
as 6:2018cv06422
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Defendant:
Town of Brighton, Patrick O'Flynn, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPhail v. Doorley et al
as 6:2018cv06339
Plaintiff:
Elwell McPhail, II
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley, Esq., Perry Duckles, Douglas A. Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. The People Of The State Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04532
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley, j. Scott Odorisi, Michael P. Schiano and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mikel v. Doorley et al
as 6:2016cv06675
Plaintiff:
Charles Mikel
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley and Joel Wittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06104
Plaintiff:
James Nelson
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Sandra Doorley , Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeanpierre v. Doorley et al
as 1:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jeanpierre, III
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley, Jane Doe, Patrick M. O'Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
