Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Ogunkoya v. Drake
as 17-3235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Seun Ogunkoya
Defendant:
Albert Drake, III, Investigator, Dariusz Zysk, Investigator, Peter Schrage, Trooper and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Susan Doorley, Mark Monaghan, James Egan and others
Smith v. The People Of The State Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04532
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley, j. Scott Odorisi, Michael P. Schiano and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abdalla v. DeMarco et al
as 6:2017cv06147
Plaintiff:
Osama Osman Abdalla
Defendant:
John DeMarco, Sandra Doorley and Shannon O'Keefe Pero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gallo et al v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2017cv06122
Defendant:
County of Monroe , Monroe County District Attorney's Office , Sandra Doorley and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Gallo and Luciano Gallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Mikel v. Doorley et al
as 6:2016cv06675
Plaintiff:
Charles Mikel
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley and Joel Wittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierre v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06428
Plaintiff:
Charles Pierre
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Rochester Police Department , Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06427
Plaintiff:
Charles Pierre
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06104
Plaintiff:
James Nelson
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Sandra Doorley , Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeanpierre v. Doorley et al
as 1:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jeanpierre, III
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley, Jane Doe, Patrick M. O'Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06103
Plaintiff:
James Nelson
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Sandra Doorley, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
