Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Roosevelt Smith, Elizabeth Buckley, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Doorley et al
as 6:2015cv06755
Plaintiff:
Andre Barnes
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley, Esq., Christine Callanan, Esq., Christine Seppeler, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Brooks et al
as 6:2015cv06327
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Thomas
Defendant:
Maggie Brooks, Sandra Doorley, Francis Affronti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Rochester Police Department et al
as 6:2015cv06284
Plaintiff:
Otis B. Willis, Jr.
Defendant:
Rochester Police Department, City of Rochester - Mayor Lovely Warren, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. McNamara et al
as 6:2015cv06229
Plaintiff:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
James McNamara, John VanLoon, Richard Fontanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. DeMarco et al
as 6:2015cv06179
Plaintiff:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
John L. DeMarco, Sandra Doorley and Stephen X. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Doorley
as 6:2014cv06671
Plaintiff:
James Dean Kendrick
Defendant:
Sandra Doorley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Brooks et al
as 1:2014cv00833
Plaintiff:
Isiah Williams
Defendant:
Maggie Brooks, Cheryl Dinolfo, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeMarco et al v. Crenshaw
as 6:2014cv06169
Respondent:
John L. DeMarco and Sandra Doorley
Petitioner:
William Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Warren et al
as 6:2014cv06153
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Hernandez
Defendant:
Lovely Warren, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
