Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Charles v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv24505
Plaintiff:
Jahmal Charles
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Jimmy Coker and Santa Rosa Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Santa Rosa Correctional Institution
as 6:2017cv02132
Plaintiff:
James Cameron Washington
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

as 3:2017cv00666
Plaintiff:
DALE ANTWUN DAVIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PERSONNEL CONTRACTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

as 3:2017cv00486
Petitioner:
ARTHUR WILLIAMS, SR
Respondent:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Santa Rosa Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv21914
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPELAND v. SMITH et al

as 5:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
BYRON COPELAND
Defendant:
SMITH, DOE, SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v JONES, et al

as 3:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
JOHN FITZGERALD HENDERSON, SR.
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, COLDPEPPER, RICHARD COMERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson, Sr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01808
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Henderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Mr. Coldpepper, Richard Comerford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00514
Plaintiff:
Carl Wesley Britt
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Jim Dunagan, Hollie Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRISON v. SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

as 3:2014cv00673
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MORRISON
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.