Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 236
The AASI Beneficiaries Trust, by and through Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee v. AVX Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv03472
Defendant: Hitachi Chemical Co. Ltd., Nichicon Corporation, Shinyei Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Counter Defendant: THE AASI BENEFICIARIES TRUST, BY AND THROUGH KENNETH A. WELT, LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant: Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent: Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor: United States of America
Petitioner: Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant: Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party: Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 21-15200
Defendant: LG CHEM, LTD., SONY ENERGY DEVICES CORPORATION, MAXWELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee: CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS, STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND and MICHAEL FRANK BEDNARZ
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff: Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant: Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: United States of America
Not Classified By Court: Satoshi Okubo
Respondent: Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party: Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 21-15022
Defendant / Appellee: LG CHEM, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant: STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Shenzhen Unit Pack Power Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 9:2019cv81535
Defendant: Shenzhen Unit Pack Power Technology Co., Ltd., Panasonic Corporation, California Ebike, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16855
Defendant / Appellee: LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified: GORDON B. MORGAN
Christopher Andrews, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16803
Defendant / Appellee: NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified: CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. v. Intel Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01709
Defendant: Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Digi-Key Corporation v. AVX Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00184
Defendant: Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Nichicon Corporation, Shinyei Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Digi-Key Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?