Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Regassa v. Sanders et al
as 3:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Admassu Regassa
Defendant:
K. Sanders, R. Baskerville, C. Krawczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jermel Pope v. M. Hewitt, et al
as 17-2875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMEL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. HEWITT, Mailroom Supervisor, JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director and others
Flute v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv01688
Defendant:
USA, Lozano, Lozano (I) and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Flute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Watson et al
as 1:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
Bradley Scott Clark, Sr
Defendant:
Thomas Watson, Jeffrey Rendon, Sara M Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Waters v. Rios et al
as 0:2017cv01367
Petitioner:
John Joseph Waters, Jr.
Respondent:
M. Rios , William True, III , Thomas R. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. Revell, et al
as 17-1138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director, JACK FOX, Warden, B. SANDOVAL, Correctional Officer and others
Young v. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2017cv03066
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Sara M. Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jermel Pope v. M. Hewitt, et al
as 17-1564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMEL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. HEWITT, Mailroom Supervisor, JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director and others
HIll v. Revell et al
as 1:2017cv00555
Plaintiff:
David E. Hill
Defendant:
Sara M. Revell, Jack Fox, B. Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, CAPTAIN, JOHN CARAWAY and others
Recruited Counsel:
ONI N. HARTON, JOHN MALEY and LADENE MENDOZA
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
