Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 5:2024cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHAVEZ v. DOURGTHY et al
as 1:2023cv01836
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEJUAN CHAVEZ
Defendant:
CHRIS DOURGTHY and SARAH BARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chavez v. Dourgthy et al
as 6:2023cv03224
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeJuan Chavez
Defendant:
Chris Dourgthy and Sarah Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chavez v. Dougthy et al
as 1:2023cv22166
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chavez
Defendant:
Chris Dougthy and Sarah Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Holston Medical Group, P.C.
as 3:2020cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Little, Colleen Harkreader, Venessa Everett and others
Defendant:
Holston Medical Group, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
THURMAN v. LAWRENCE, et al.

as 1:2015cv01085
Defendant:
SARAH BARKER and WILLIAM LAWRENCE
Plaintiff:
SHARON THURMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lanyon et al v. HRB Tax Group, Inc., et al

as 1:2013cv00907
Plaintiff:
David Lanyon , Amy Lanyon , David Barker and others
Defendant:
HRB Tax Group, Inc. and HRB Technology LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BARKER et al v. CAREFUSION 303, INC. et al

as 1:2011cv00938
Plaintiff:
N. B., ANDREW BARKER and SARAH BARKER
Defendant:
CARDINAL HEALTH 303, INC. and CAREFUSION 303, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 4:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.