Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lynton Ballentine
as 17-2187
Petitioner - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
SATTERFIELD LEGAL, PLLC, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE and SARAH BANKS, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, ATTORNEY IN FACT
Defendant - Appellant:
LYNTON BALLENTINE and LB INTERNATIONAL EXPRESS TRUST, NON CORPORATE ENTITY (RELA PARTY IN INTEREST, TERTIUS INTERVENIE)
SATTERFIELD LEGAL, PLLC v. BALLENTINE et al
as 1:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
SATTERFIELD LEGAL, PLLC and SARAH BANKS
Defendant:
LYNTON YATES BALLENTINE, JR. and LB INTERNATIONAL EXPRESS TRUST
Interested_party:
JAMES RONALD PEGGS
Counter_claimant:
LB INTERNATIONAL EXPRESS TRUST and LYNTON YATES BALLENTINE, JR.
Counter_defendant:
SARAH BANKS and SATTERFIELD LEGAL, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CMH Homes, Inc. et al v. Simmons et al
as 2:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc. , CMH Manufacturing, Inc. , Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mary C. Simmons and Sarah Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as NYE/2:16-cv-01970
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bank
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Bank v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv01970
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bank
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
Jessica Acosta, Kathleen Ajedlice, Allison Akers and others
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
