Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Nakanwagi v. City of Phoenix, et al.
as 24-1862
Plaintiff:
SARAH NATHREEN NAKANWAGI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF ARIZONA, COUNTY OF MARICOPA and others
Nakanwagi v. City of Flagstaff
as 24-835
Plaintiff:
SARAH NATHREEN NAKANWAGI
Defendant:
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF
Nakanwagi v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10051
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nakanwagi v. United States Postal Services et al
as 1:2023cv13118
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
United States Postal Services and City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nakanwagi v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2023cv08610
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nakanwagi v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv08543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Nakanwagi v. Executive Office of the Trial Court
as 1:2023cv10533
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi and Pro se litigant Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Executive Office of the Trial Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nakanwagi v. The Dolben Company Inc et al
as 1:2023cv10532
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi and Pro se litigant Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
The Dolben Company Inc and Ninety-Three Realty Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
