Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Kane v. de Blasio
as 22-1876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Kane, individually, and for all others similarly situated, William Castro, individually, and for all others similarly situated, Margaret Chu, individually, and for all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
Matthew Keil, John De Luca, Dennis Strk and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Adams, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of New York, David Chokshi, in his official capacity of Health Commissioner of the City of New York and New York City Department of Education
Kane v. de Blasio
as 21-3047
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keil, John De Luca, Sasha Delgado and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Kane, William Castro, Margaret Chu and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bill de Blasio, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of New York, David Chokshi, in his official capacity of Health Commissioner of the City of New York, New York City Department of Education and others
Keil v. The City of New York
as 21-3043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Keil, John De Luca, Sasha Delgado and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The City of New York, Board of Education of the City School District of New York, David Chokshi, in his official capacity of Health Commissioner of the City of New York and others
Keil v. The City of New York
as 21-2711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Keil, John De Luca, Sasha Delgado and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The City of New York, Board of Education of the City School District of New York, David Chokshi, in his Official Capacity of Health Commissioner of the City of New York and others
Keil et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv08773
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keil, John De Luca, Sasha Delgado and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Board of Education of the City School District of New York, David Chokshi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 bb
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.