Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arthur Ramos v. Schenker, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv01551
Defendant:
Schenker, Inc., Schenker Logistics, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Authur Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nena McMillian et al v. Schenker Logistics, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00018
Defendant:
ADP, LLC, DB Schenker, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Nena McMillian
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Starr v. DB Schenker, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joe Starr
Defendant:
Schenker, Inc. and Schenker Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fubon Insurance Co. Ltd. et al v. Travelers Transportation Services Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04851
Plaintiff:
Fubon Insurance Co. Ltd. , Cathay Century Insurance Co. Ltd. and South China Insurance Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Travelers Transportation Services Inc. and Schenker Logistics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Transwest Capital, Inc. v. Cashless Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Transwest Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Cashless Concepts, Inc., Danny Ray Digman, United Rentals, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Schenker Logistics, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Cashless Concepts, Inc. and Danny Ray Digman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
