Cases 1 - 10 of 1,921
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Tennesa Scott
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio v. Barksdale
as 1:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Defendant:
Christopher Scott Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Scott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
Vickey Scott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01387
Plaintiff:
Scott Noel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Wits End of Twinsburg, LLC et al.
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Christian Harris
Defendant:
Wits End of Twinsburg, LLC doing business as Brewsters Cafe Bistro Pub, Scott B Rafuse and Colin Rafuse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Emma Scott
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Solly v. Hoying et al
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Solly
Defendant:
Lisa Hoying, Annette Chambers-Smith, Glenn Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lonne v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Scott Lonne
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
