Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01950
Plaintiff:
LUCIO ORTIZ-CONTRERAS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WATTLETON v. DODRILL
as 1:2013cv01355
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00205
Petitioner:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURKE v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2011cv00717
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN G. BURKE
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, JOYCE CONLEY, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEWIN v. DODRILL et al
as 1:2010cv00782
Petitioner:
BARRY WILLIAM GEWIN
Respondent:
SCOTT DODRILL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00277
Petitioner:
ANGEL GONZALES
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NELSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. NELSON
Defendant:
TYRONE WILLIAMS, EDWARD F. RIELLY, ISACC FULWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDONALD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv01897
Petitioner:
DAVID JOVON MCDONALD
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STANKO v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv01757
Petitioner:
RUDOLPH STANKO
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HEMMINGS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00907
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. HEMMINGS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADAM MICHAEL ABENSOHN, SEAN THOMAS HARAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
